Legal News

Federal Court Stops IRS from Regulating Nonprofessional Tax Preparers
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

On Friday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted nonprofessional tax preparers a permanent injunction stopping the 2011 IRS tax return preparer regulatory program in its tracks.

The regulatory program had been launched by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service to regulate the thousands of non-professional tax return preparers, but the injunction raises questions about the multi-million dollar enforcement program and its future.

IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman, who stepped down in November, had called for the IRS effort to weed out tax preparation fraud. The regulations launched by Shulman requires tax preparers to register with the IRS under the provisions of the IRS Return Preparer Initiative, which started in 2011.

  
What
Where


The regulations also required tax return preparers, in particular those without professional credentials, to sit for competency tests and classes to maintain their registration with the IRS. President Obama’s fiscal 2013 budget has already awarded federal contracts for the program, which requested $35 million from the Congress.

The new ruling could affect up to 700,000 tax return preparers in the country.

In March 2012, the Institute for Justice, along with three independent tax preparers challenged the legal authority of the IRS initiative, and alleged that the IRS was enforcing the regulations without required approval from the Congress. But the IRS said that a law dating from 1884 provided it the authority.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




However, while issuing the permanent injunction, the federal court observed, “With an invalid regulatory regime on the IRS’s side of the scale and a threat to plaintiff’s livelihood on the other, the balance of hardships tips strongly in favor of plaintiffs.”

The case is Sabina Loving, et al, v. Internal Revenue Service, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 12-cv-385.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Employment Attorney (Remote) in Burbank, CA.

USA-CA-Burbank

     We are a small and highly respected Burbank based REMOTE employment litigation d...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Torrance

​Position: Associate Attorney Firm: The Legacy Lawyers, P.C. Culture: "America First Pat...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Irvine

​Position: Associate Attorney Firm: The Legacy Lawyers, P.C. Culture: "America First Pat...

Apply now

Associate Attorney - Defense Litigation Experience

USA-TX-Dallas

Galloway\'s Dallas office is seeking an Associate Attorneys with 1 - 2 years of experience...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Education Law Attorney

USA-CA-El Segundo

El Segundo office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law attorney with ...

Apply Now

Education Law Attorney

USA-CA-Carlsbad

Carlsbad office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law attorney with 4-...

Apply Now

Education Law and Public Entity Attorney

USA-CA-El Segundo

El Segundo office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law and public ent...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top