Breaking News

Federal Court Holds Holder Should Submit Fast and Furious Documents
Download PDF
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading...

It seems Attorney General Eric Holder may not be able to continue withholding documents related to Operation Fast and Furious and keep them under the shroud of executive privilege. On Tuesday, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the DOJ’s petition to dismiss a suit over subpoenaed documents related to the Operation Fast and Furious.

While rejecting the petition by the Department of Justice to allow the Attorney General continue withholding the subpoenaed documents, US District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson observed, “In the Court’s view, endorsing the proposition that the executive may assert an unreviewable right to withhold materials from the legislature would offend the Constitution more than undertaking to resolve the specific dispute that has been presented here. After all, the Constitution contemplates not only a separation, but a balance, of powers.”

  
What
Where


Operation Fast and Furious was a covert operation of the US Department of Justice in which guns were smuggled into Mexico for the ostensible purpose of tracking them. Some of the same guns were used to kill U.S. border agents. When things became known the DOJ aborted the operation.

However, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee started an investigation and subpoenaed Attorney General Eric Holder to turn over documents relating to the Fast and Furious Operation, to the committee.

Get JD Journal in Your Mail

Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!




Holder found it prudent not to comply with the subpoenas. The Department of Justice backed him up by announcing that it was not going to prosecute Holder, and when the Oversight Committee voted to hold Eric Holder in contempt of Congress, President Obama claimed the documents were protected by executive privilege.

A lawsuit was initiated by the House Oversight Committee over the subpoenaed documents in August last year asking for a court order requiring Holder to deliver the specific documents withheld under executive privilege. The DOJ moved to dismiss the lawsuit, the court, on Tuesday dismissed the DOJ’s petition.





 

RELEVANT JOBS

Litigation Employment Attorney (Remote) in Burbank, CA.

USA-CA-Burbank

     We are a small and highly respected Burbank based REMOTE employment litigation d...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Torrance

​Position: Associate Attorney Firm: The Legacy Lawyers, P.C. Culture: "America First Pat...

Apply now

Litigation Attorney

USA-CA-Irvine

​Position: Associate Attorney Firm: The Legacy Lawyers, P.C. Culture: "America First Pat...

Apply now

Associate Attorney - Defense Litigation Experience

USA-TX-Dallas

Galloway\'s Dallas office is seeking an Associate Attorneys with 1 - 2 years of experience...

Apply now

BCG FEATURED JOB

Locations:

Keyword:



Search Now

Education Law Attorney

USA-CA-El Segundo

El Segundo office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law attorney with ...

Apply Now

Education Law Attorney

USA-CA-Carlsbad

Carlsbad office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law attorney with 4-...

Apply Now

Education Law and Public Entity Attorney

USA-CA-El Segundo

El Segundo office of a BCG Attorney Search Top Ranked Law Firm seeks an education law and public ent...

Apply Now

Most Popular

SEARCH IN ARCHIVE

To Top