Florida State Attorney Andrew Warren is fighting to be reinstated in his position as the lead prosecutor in Hillsborough County, Florida, following his suspension by Governor Ron DeSantis. The ongoing dispute between Warren and DeSantis stems from Warren’s refusal to prosecute criminal cases related to abortion. Lawyers representing Warren have recently filed a reply in support of a federal appeals court petition, asserting that his suspension violated federal laws and lacked a legitimate basis under the Florida Constitution.
In August 2022, Governor DeSantis suspended Warren after the state attorney publicly stated that he would not prosecute individuals involved in seeking or providing abortions. Warren’s lawyers argue that the suspension is “illegal” and are seeking a writ of quo warranto and a writ of mandamus to challenge the propriety of DeSantis’s actions and compel his reinstatement.
The reply submitted by Warren’s legal team rebuts DeSantis’s claim that he has the authority to suspend a state attorney for exercising individualized discretion in a way he deems improper. They contend that such authority is not explicitly granted in the executive order issued by DeSantis and therefore cannot be used as grounds for Warren’s suspension.
Moreover, the reply highlights that the executive order fails to meet the required standards set by the Florida Constitution. According to the Constitution, an executive order must demonstrate “incompetency” or “neglect of duty.” Warren’s lawyers assert that DeSantis’s executive order fails to meet these criteria and, as a result, violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Trust BCG Attorney Search to connect you with top legal employers in your area. Search now!
The legal battle between Warren and DeSantis commenced when Warren filed a lawsuit challenging his suspension. DeSantis argues that Warren neglected his duty as Florida State Attorney by refusing to prosecute cases related to abortion rights.
Warren’s legal team maintains that the suspension was unlawful and unconstitutional. They assert that the governor’s actions infringed upon Warren’s First Amendment rights, as he merely expressed his conscientious objection to prosecuting cases involving abortion. By refusing to carry out such prosecutions, Warren believed he was exercising his discretion in alignment with his own moral and ethical principles.
The reply submitted by Warren’s lawyers adds weight to their argument that DeSantis’s suspension lacked legal basis and violated both federal and state laws. They contend that the executive order failed to provide sufficient grounds for the suspension and did not meet the necessary standards outlined in the Florida Constitution.
As the legal battle continues, Warren seeks to regain his position as the lead prosecutor in Hillsborough County. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the balance between individual conscience and prosecutorial obligations, as well as the limits of a governor’s authority in suspending elected officials.
This legal dispute serves as a notable example of the ongoing debates surrounding abortion rights and the extent to which personal beliefs should influence the execution of prosecutorial duties. As Warren’s fight for reinstatement progresses, it will undoubtedly attract attention from both legal experts and those following the ongoing political and social discussions surrounding reproductive rights in the United States.