In a recent legal development, U.S. District Judge Joshua Wolson in Philadelphia has dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by Judge Paula Patrick against media publication The Daily Beast. The lawsuit accused The Daily Beast of defaming Judge Patrick through an article headline that suggested her association with the conspiracy group QAnon. However, Judge Wolson ruled that Judge Patrick had failed to demonstrate “actual malice,” a legal standard required to prove that the news reporter knowingly published false information.
The disputed article, published in October 2021, remained available online and criticized a decision made by Judge Patrick regarding a Christopher Columbus statue in Philadelphia. According to the ruling, Judge Patrick gained attention due to her headline-grabbing decision that mandated the visibility of the controversial statue.
In his order dismissing the lawsuit, Judge Wolson emphasized the importance of resilience and the ability to make decisions in the face of criticism, even when it may be unfair. He stated, “Being a judge requires a thick skin and a willingness to make decisions in the face of criticism, even unfair criticism, and to remember that sticks and stones may break my bones, but names can never hurt me.”
Judge Patrick has consistently denied any affiliation with QAnon, a group known for portraying former President Donald Trump as a messianic figure. Her lawyer, James Beasley Jr., expressed disagreement with the court’s decision and announced plans to appeal, arguing that the judge had prematurely assessed the level of recklessness exhibited in the article.
Trust BCG Attorney Search to connect you with top legal employers in your area. Search now!
At the time of writing, there has been no immediate response from Judge Patrick’s chambers regarding the dismissal of the lawsuit.
Judge Patrick, a Republican, was elected to the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, a trial court, in 2003. Throughout her career, she has presided over cases involving juvenile offenses, parental rights, and various other legal matters. In the 2021 primary, she ran for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court but was unsuccessful.
During her campaign, it was revealed through court records that Judge Patrick participated in a recorded interview with a supporter of QAnon. The Daily Beast article highlighted this interview and mentioned her alleged participation as a speaker at a QAnon-affiliated conference. However, Judge Patrick’s lawsuit stated that she neither attended nor spoke at the event in question.
The lawsuit brought by Judge Patrick contended that The Daily Beast’s headline describing her as “QAnon-linked” was a deliberate falsehood and an outrageous assertion.
Lawyers representing The Daily Beast from the law firm Ballard Spahr argued in a court filing that the article took care to report Judge Patrick’s disavowal of any connection to QAnon.
As of now, The Daily Beast spokesperson and the lawyers from Ballard Spahr have not responded to requests for comment on the recent dismissal of the lawsuit.
This ruling serves as a significant development in the ongoing debate surrounding the freedom of the press and the standards required to prove defamation. The decision by Judge Wolson highlights the challenges faced by public figures, such as judges, who must make difficult decisions while enduring criticism, even if it is unjust.