U.S. District Judge Refers Patent Monetization Firm IP Edge and Attorneys for Investigation

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading...

Allegations of Concealment and Misconduct in Delaware Patent Cases

In a significant development, U.S. District Judge Colm Connolly has referred Texas-based patent monetization firm IP Edge and its legal representatives to various authorities, urging investigations into their conduct regarding a series of patent cases in Delaware.

Concealed Ownership and Violations of Professional Conduct Rules

Judge Connolly revealed that patent plaintiffs Nimitz Technologies, Mellaconic, and Lamplight Licensing, all backed by IP Edge, concealed that IP Edge was the “de facto” owner of the patents involved in the cases. Additionally, he asserted that the attorneys representing these plaintiffs violated professional conduct rules.

Undisclosed Monetary Interest and Call for DOJ Investigation

The judge also uncovered evidence suggesting that France Brevets, a government-owned investment fund that closed its operations last year, had an undisclosed monetary interest in the litigation. Consequently, he called upon the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate whether failing to disclose such interests and other relevant parties violated federal law.

  

What

Where

Search Jobs

Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.

Unauthorized Practice of Law and Potential Criminal Prosecution

Judge Connolly referred IP Edge attorneys to the Texas Supreme Court in a separate move, alleging they practiced law without proper authorization. This referral opens the possibility of criminal prosecution in the state.

Plaintiffs Dismiss Lawsuits Amid Technology Patent Coverage

The plaintiff companies, Nimitz Technologies, Mellaconic, and Lamplight Licensing, voluntarily dismissed their patent lawsuits last year. These lawsuits covered a spectrum of technology related to computers and cell phones.

Stay up-to-date without the overwhelming noise. Subscribe to JDJournal for a curated selection of the most relevant legal news.

Denials and Neutral Consideration

George Pazuniak of O’Kelly & O’Rourke, the representative for Nimitz, maintained that the plaintiffs’ attorneys had not engaged in any wrongdoing or unprofessional conduct. He expressed relief that the issues were now being transferred to neutral bodies for impartial consideration.

Silence from IP Edge and Defendant Representatives

Despite the gravity of the allegations, representatives for IP Edge, including attorneys Jimmy Chong and Andrew Curfman representing Mellaconic and Lamplight, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Similarly, defendants such as BuzzFeed and Bloomberg, named in the lawsuits, refrained from commenting.

Shell Companies and Allegations of Loyalty Breach

In his statement, Judge Connolly characterized the plaintiff companies as “relatively unsophisticated” shell entities created to shield IP Edge from liability. He asserted that the attorneys representing these companies breached their obligation of providing “undivided loyalty” to their clients, as their actions were driven by IP Edge’s interests rather than their clients.

Investigation into Potential Federal Law and PTO Violations

Emphasizing the seriousness of the situation, Judge Connolly referred the cases to the Justice Department and the Patent and Trademark Office for investigations into whether IP Edge violated federal law or PTO rules by making false statements to a federal agency.

Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.