Loading...
Ulf Johannemann, formerly the Global Head of Tax at the prestigious Biglaw firm Freshfields, has been handed a three 1/2-year jail term by a German court, marking the climax of a high-profile legal saga.
The Verdict
Johannemann’s downfall stems from his involvement in a complex tax scheme orchestrated for Maple Bank, a now-defunct financial institution. He provided strategic counsel that enabled Maple Bank to exploit legal loopholes and claim substantial tax credits unlawfully.
Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.
The Scheme Unraveled
The intricate maneuver, known as the ‘Cum Ex’ trading scheme, operated under the guise of legitimacy. Johannemann, leveraging his expertise, endorsed this dubious scheme during his tenure at Freshfields from 2006 to 2009. The scheme involved manipulating ownership of shares to facilitate double tax refunds on capital gains tax, resulting in Maple Bank reclaiming an astonishing EUR383 million in taxes it never paid.
Legal Fallout
However, German authorities eventually caught wind of the illicit practices and deemed them unlawful. Consequently, Maple Bank’s German operations faced closure, prompting legal action from bank administrators against Freshfields. The legal dispute culminated in Freshfields’ agreement to a EUR50 million settlement with Maple Bank’s administrators and an additional voluntary payment of EUR10 million to German tax authorities in 2021 to evade further legal repercussions.
Get JD Journal in Your Mail
Subscribe to our FREE daily news alerts and get the latest updates on the most happening events in the legal, business, and celebrity world. You also get your daily dose of humor and entertainment!!
Firm’s Response and Johannemann’s Departure
In an effort to mitigate damage to its reputation, Freshfields swiftly distanced itself from Johannemann following his departure from the firm in 2019, just before his arrest. In response to Johannemann’s sentencing, a spokesperson for the firm emphasized that Freshfields was not directly involved in the proceedings and refrained from commenting on the verdict. The firm reiterated its commitment to cooperating with authorities within its professional obligations to address and learn from the matter.
This landmark case underscores the legal and ethical complexities prominent law firms and their senior partners face in navigating the fine line between aggressive tax strategies and illegal conduct.
Don’t be a silent ninja! Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.
