Texas Jury Rules Samsung Owes $142 Million in Wireless Patent Case

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading...

In a recent development, Samsung Electronics has been instructed by a Texas federal jury to pay $142 million to patent owner G+ Communications for infringing on G+ patents concerning 5G wireless technology used in its Galaxy smartphones.

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

Verdict Details

The jury’s decision indicates that Samsung is liable for two separate lump-sum payments: $61 million for violating one G+ patent and $81 million for another.

  

What

Where

Search Jobs

Uncover exclusive insights and strategic approaches through the State of the Lateral Law Firm Legal Market 2024—an in-depth report delving into the intricate patterns and current trends within the lateral law firm market.

Background and Legal Proceedings

Plano-based G+ Communications possesses patents essential for devices to adhere to 5G wireless standards, as recognized by international standards organizations. Alleging that Samsung incorporated its technology into 5G-capable Galaxy smartphones without obtaining a license, G+ initiated legal action against Samsung in 2022.

Samsung refuted these claims, contending that the patents were invalid and asserting that G+ failed to offer licenses on fair and reasonable terms, as required by standards organizations.

Want to stay ahead of the competition? Here’s what you need to do.

Retrial and Outcome

Following a three-day retrial on damages, Chief U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap annulled an earlier $67.5 million verdict for G+ in the same case. The retrial aimed to reassess the appropriate damages, prompted by concerns that the initial jury might have been confused about whether the award should be a lump sum or a running royalty.

Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.

Reactions

G+ attorney Jennifer Truelove expressed satisfaction with the verdict, while representatives for Samsung have yet to respond to requests for comment on the outcome.

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

Case Details

The case, titled G+ Communications LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, was heard in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, with the case number 2:22-cv-00078.

Stay up-to-date without the overwhelming noise. Subscribe to JDJournal for a curated selection of the most relevant legal news.

Legal Representation

• For G+: Jason Sheasby, Lisa Glasser, and Michael Harbour of Irell & Manella; Jennifer Truelove and Samuel Baxter of McKool Smith
• For Samsung: Ruffin Cordell, John Thornburgh, Michael McKeon, Ralph Phillips, Linhong Zhang, April Sunyoung Park, Leonard Davis, Thomas Reger, and Aleksandr Gelberg of Fish & Richardson