Workday AI Bias Case and EEOC’s Involvement

The US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently filed a brief supporting a plaintiff who alleged that Workday Inc.’s AI-based hiring tools discriminated against him and others. This move by the EEOC has raised questions about whether software vendors can be held liable in cases of AI bias, expanding the definition of “employment agency” under federal civil rights laws.

Want to stay ahead of the competition? Here’s what you need to do.

EEOC’s Stance and Legal Challenge

The EEOC’s brief suggests that companies like Workday could be liable under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act for discriminatory practices facilitated by their AI tools. However, this position faces skepticism and internal disagreement within the EEOC.

Want to know if you’re earning what you deserve? Find out with LawCrossing’s salary surveys.

Workday’s Response and Legal Battle

Workday has strongly opposed the EEOC’s stance, arguing that the commission lacks sufficient legal grounds for asserting vendor liability. Plaintiff Derek Mobley’s lawsuit against Workday alleges racial, age, and disability bias in the company’s hiring tools, though it does not directly name employers.

Whether you’re a recent law school grad or an experienced attorney, BCG Attorney Search has the job for you.

Complexity of Vendor Liability

Proving vendor liability in AI bias cases presents significant legal challenges. While the EEOC contends that software vendors can be considered “employment agencies,” courts may struggle to reconcile this with existing definitions. Workday argues that ultimate responsibility lies with employers, not vendors, in the use of AI tools for hiring decisions.

Stay up-to-date without the overwhelming noise. Subscribe to JDJournal for a curated selection of the most relevant legal news.

Implications and Future Outlook

The outcome of the Mobley v. Workday case will have far-reaching implications for AI regulation and vendor accountability. Despite the legal complexities, the EEOC’s involvement signals a growing focus on addressing AI bias in employment practices. As the case progresses, it will set important precedents for the liability of AI vendors in discriminatory hiring practices.